Neil Chilson
Senior Research Fellow for Technology and Innovation
Charles Koch Institute
Neil Chilson
Senior Research Fellow for Technology and Innovation
Charles Koch Institute
Neil Chilson is a Senior Research Fellow for Technology and Innovation at the Charles Koch Institute. In this position, he will help spearhead the Institute’s continued efforts to foster an environment that encourages innovation and the individual and societal progress it makes possible.
Mr. Chilson was appointed the Federal Trade Commision’s (FTC) acting chief technologist in July 2017. His work focused on understanding the economics of privacy, convening a workshop on informational injury, and establishing the FTC’s Blockchain Working Group, among other things. Prior to his appointment, he was an advisor to then-Acting FTC Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen. In both roles he advised Chairman Ohlhausen and worked with Commission staff on nearly every major technology-related case, report, workshop, or other proceeding since January 2014, when he joined her office. Before he joined the FTC, Mr. Chilson practiced telecommunications law at Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP.
Mr. Chilson holds a law degree from the George Washington University Law School, a master’s degree in computer science from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and a bachelor’s degree in computer science from Harding University.
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Regulatory Transparency Project events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on the website does not imply an endorsement or relationship between the person and the Regulatory Transparency Project. The Regulatory Transparency Project takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Contributions
Explainer Episode 50 – FTC on Privacy: The Statutory Authority Behind the Plan
Last November, the Federal Trade Commission accepted comments on its proposal to start a rulemaking related to “Commercial Surveillance” – the agency’s newly minted term for any and all business use of data about customers.
Listen to this podcast
Deep Dive Episode 163 – Shapers of Cyber Speech: Silicon Valley and American Discourse
Experts debate the pros and cons of regulatory proposals aimed at curbing social media content moderation.
Listen to this podcast
Shapers of Cyber Speech – Silicon Valley and American Discourse
What are the realistic regulatory options for curbing Silicon Valley’s influence on the national discourse? What are the potential downsides of these options?
Watch this video
The DOJ’s Weak Case Against Google
Neil Chilson
Governing the Internet: Antitrust enforcement can ensure competitive markets that benefit consumers. But politicized antitrust benefits a few companies and politicians at the expense of everyone else.
Read this article
Explainer Episode 16 – An Update on Antitrust and Big Tech
Neil Chilson breaks down the recent developments with antitrust and big tech and discusses how they fit into the broader picture of antitrust law in the United States.
Listen to this podcast
The Price of Privacy: A Debate over Corporate Surveillance
Data is being collected on each of us every day by the apps that we use, the websites that we visit, and the services we subscribe to. How is this data used by companies and organizations? What is the difference between data security and data privacy? Where should the balance be struck between privacy and the benefits of increased data collection? This video will discuss these questions and more.
Watch this videoFCC’s O’Rielly on First Amendment & Fairness Doctrine Dangers
Neil Chilson and Adam Thierer
Governing the Internet: Plenty of people claim to favor freedom of expression, but increasingly the First Amendment has more fair-weather friends than die-hard defenders.
Read this article
Deep Dive Episode 117 – How to Approach Data Collection and Breaches in the Age of COVID-19
What are the data privacy and security implications for widespread data collection for COVID-19 contact tracing? Drew Bagley, Neil Chilson, and Roger Klein discuss.
Listen to this podcast
Tech Roundup Episode 10 – Trump’s Executive Order on Online Censorship
What is the legislative and legal background of the recent Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship, how will it affect Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, and what may be the unforeseen consequences of this move? These and other questions are addressed in this episode.
Listen to this podcast
Deep Dive Episode 109 – Regulating by Consent Agreement: Examining FTC’s YouTube Settlement and Beyond
This episode explores FTC settlements and consent decrees, including the YouTube case and what it means for FTC enforcement going forward.
Listen to this podcast
Deep Dive Episode 106 – Should Big Tech Platforms Be Viewpoint Neutral? Should the Government Care?
On March 4, 2020, the Regulatory Transparency Project sponsored a symposium with the University of Pennsylvania Federalist Society student chapter. This episode features audio from the second panel.
Listen to this podcast
Regulating Big Tech: Should Social Media Platforms Be Viewpoint Neutral? Should the Government Care?
On March 4, 2020, the Regulatory Transparency Project sponsored a symposium with the University of Pennsylvania Federalist Society student chapter. The second panel of the symposium was titled “Should Social Media Platforms Be Viewpoint Neutral? Should the Government Care?”
Watch this videoExplainer Episode 11 – GDPR Compliance and Cybersecurity Concerns
In this episode, Ashley Baker and Neil Chilson discuss the implications for data security under recently-enacted privacy laws.
Listen to this podcast
Deep Dive Episode 46 – Big Tech, Competition, and Antitrust Enforcement
Neil Chilson and Charlotte Slaiman discuss the debate over governmental oversight of big tech companies and the proper role of the federal government in promoting consumer welfare and market competition.
Listen to this podcast
Reboot 2018: Are We Headed for a U.S. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)?
With continued scrutiny over social media companies’ data practices, states are stepping in to pass aggressive new privacy laws. For instance, the recently enacted California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 will be the toughest data privacy law in the nation when it goes into effect in 2020. But with fears over navigating a patchwork of inconsistent laws, tech companies are increasingly interested in a federal privacy bill that will preempt the states. What might this look like, how likely is it to happen in the next Congress, and what will it mean for consumers?
The Regulatory Transparency Project co-sponsored the Lincoln Network’s Reboot 2018 conference.
Watch this video