Julius “Jerry” Loeser
Julius “Jerry” Loeser
Jerry Loeser was of counsel in the Chicago office of Winston & Strawn, and his practice focused on banking regulation. He has extensive experience in counseling financial services clients on, among other things, bank acquisitions, privacy, financial modernization, the USA PATRIOT Act, Basel II and III, lending limits, capital, trust, affiliate transactions, and Federal Reserve, OCC, FDIC, and CFPB regulations.
Prior to working at large corporate law firms, Jerry was chief regulatory and compliance counsel for Comerica Bank, where he also served as senior vice president and deputy general counsel and as general counsel of its retail bank division. Before that, he served as chief regulatory in-house counsel at Wells Fargo & Co. Jerry began his legal career advising the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C.
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Regulatory Transparency Project events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on the website does not imply an endorsement or relationship between the person and the Regulatory Transparency Project. The Regulatory Transparency Project takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Contributions
Cryptocurrency Regulation in the Aftermath of FTX
With a string of cryptocurrency failures and tens of billions in losses for investors, increased regulation has become a hot topic.
Watch this videoDeep Dive Episode 252 – Cryptocurrency Regulation in the Aftermath of FTX
The collapse of FTX has intensified the debate about how cryptocurrencies should be regulated, including proposed federal legislation.
Listen to this podcastOf Class Actions and Usury – Shrinking Credit in the Second Circuit
Jerry Loeser
If successful, two class actions could discourage investors from purchasing securitized debt owed by borrowers residing in the Second Circuit, thus reducing markets for the securitization of loans by banks to borrowers residing in the Circuit.
Read this articleThe Ongoing Battle Over the CFPB’s Constitutionality
Julius Loeser
Under former CFPB Director Cordray, the CFPB defended its constitutionality, but, now, under Acting Director Mulvaney, the CFPB is arguing that the issue is now moot because Acting Director Mulvaney has ratified the enforcement actions against All American and the President has the right to remove the Acting Director at will.
Read this articleDC Circuit Decision on CFPB Leadership
Julius “Jerry” Loeser
Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, sitting en banc, issued its decision in PHH Corporation, et al. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, on whether the provision in the Dodd-Frank Act that the director of the CFPB cannot be removed by the President for any reason other than “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance” is consistent with Article II of the Constitution vesting executive power in the President who is to “take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
Read this article