Experts break down regulatory issues in 30 minutes or less.
December 2, 2020
Ashley Baker discusses the burden of proof framework currently used in competition law, the role of presumptions in antitrust litigation, and the potential implications of the burden shift proposed in a recent House Judiciary report.
Listen to this podcast
November 19, 2020
Ian Adams lays out the current state of driverless car technology and breaks down the decisions federal and state policymakers are facing when it comes to regulating it.
Listen to this podcast
October 16, 2020
Jennifer Huddleston and Ashkhen Kazaryan break down the recent news related to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Listen to this podcast
October 13, 2020
Neil Chilson breaks down the recent developments with antitrust and big tech and discusses how they fit into the broader picture of antitrust law in the United States.
Listen to this podcast
July 2, 2020
In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government is waiving affirmative action requirements in federal construction projects. Wen Fa discusses whether state and local regulations should follow suit.
Listen to this podcast
May 22, 2020
How can data privacy enforcement provide clarity for businesses while protecting the public from harm? What might be the best enforcment options available to the FTC and state attorneys general going forward? Jennifer Huddleston and Ian Adams discuss.
Listen to this podcast
May 12, 2020
In this episode, Jennifer Huddleston and Brent Skorup discuss how contact-tracing might work here, what privacy concerns it might involve, and what it means for data privacy going forward.
Listen to this podcast
March 19, 2020
In this episode, Jeff Stier draws on the experience of Impossible Burger to argue for light touch regulation on harm-reducing technologies.
Listen to this podcast
February 18, 2020
In this episode, Ashley Baker and Neil Chilson discuss the implications for data security under recently-enacted privacy laws.
Listen to this podcast
December 20, 2019
In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard, it is alleged that Harvard admissions discriminated against Asians applicants. In this episode, Pacific Legal Foundation attorney Wen Fa discusses the case, the legal context in which the case was brought, and the case’s potential implications.
Listen to this podcasta venture of
The Federalist Society
1776 I Street, NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
fedsoc.org
[email protected]
