Todd F. Gaziano
President
Center for Individual Rights
Todd F. Gaziano
President
Center for Individual Rights
Todd Gaziano is the President of the Center for Individual Rights. Mr. Gaziano received his J.D. in 1988 from the University of Chicago Law School, where he was a John M. Olin Fellow in Law and Economics. He received his B.A. from West Virginia University, summa cum laude in 1985. He was selected as a Truman Scholar from West Virginia while an undergraduate.
Mr. Gaziano’s previous legal work includes service as a law clerk for U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Judge Edith Jones, as an attorney in the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, as a chief subcommittee counsel in the U.S. House of Representatives, as a Houston trial attorney, and as a chief corporate legal officer. He also served a six-year term as commissioner on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2008-2013), where he helped conduct oversight and investigations of civil rights agencies.
For most of the last 25 years, Mr. Gaziano was a legal scholar and public interest law leader, promoting individual liberty in the Supreme Court and Congress. From 1997 to 2013, he was the founding director of the Edwin Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation. From 2014 until he joined CIR, he was the Chief of Legal Policy and Strategic Research, and Director of the Center for the Separation of Powers, at Pacific Legal Foundation.
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Regulatory Transparency Project events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on the website does not imply an endorsement or relationship between the person and the Regulatory Transparency Project. The Regulatory Transparency Project takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Contributions
The Implications of the Latest Congressional Review Act Disapprovals
Professors Jonathan Adler and Todd Gaziano discuss the CRA and its use on 3 rules earlier this year.
Watch this videoDeep Dive Episode 190 – The Implications of the Latest Congressional Review Act Disapprovals
Todd Gaziano and Professor Jonathan Adler discuss the CRA and the ramifications of its use on the three rules this year.
Listen to this podcastDeep Dive Episode 161 – Congressional Review Act: First Branch Gets the Last Word
In this live podcast, experts review the overriding purposes of the CRA and do a deep dive into its technical elements.
Listen to this podcastDeep Dive Episode 71 – Accounting for Race 101: Virginia Universities and Racial Preferences
This episode features audio from a September 10 panel that explored the implications of a study by the Center for Equal Opportunity that examines how five Virginia public universities preference certain applicants based on race.
Listen to this podcastAccounting for Race 101: Virginia Universities and Racial Preferences
On September 10, 2019, The Federalist Society hosted a luncheon co-sponsored with the Center for Equal Opportunity (CEO). CEO released and presented a new study and report entitled “Race and Ethnicity in Undergraduate Admissions at Five Virginia Universities,” which examined how admissions programs at five Virginia public universities (University of Virginia, College of William & Mary, Virginia Tech, James Madison University, and George Mason University) preference certain applicants based on race. The results of the study and its implications for the broader academic discussion of racial preferences in college admissions were discussed by the panelists.
Watch this videoDeep Dive Episode 65 – Subdelegations of Rulemaking Power and the Appointments Clause
In this episode, experts discuss whether the constitution permits inferior officers in federal agencies to issue binding rules.
Listen to this podcastDeep Dive Episode 26 – Is the FDA’s Rule on Cigars & Vaping Products Constitutional?
Todd Gaziano (Pacific Legal Foundation) and Michael Edney (Norton Rose Fulbright) discuss the constitutional implications of the FDA’s 2016 rule on cigars and vaping products.
Listen to this podcast