Sarah Binder

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Brookings

Sarah Binder

Senior Fellow, Governance Studies

Brookings

Binder is a former co-editor of Legislative Studies Quarterly, a co-author with Forrest Maltzman of Advice and Dissent: The Struggle to Shape the Federal Judiciary (Brookings, 2009), author of Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock (Brookings, 2003), Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress (Cambridge University Press, 1997), and co-author with Steven S. Smith of Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate (Brookings, 1997).  Her other work on Congressional politics has appeared in the American Political Science ReviewAmerican Journal of Political Science, and elsewhere.

Her book on legislative gridlock was awarded the 2003 Richard F. Fenno, Jr. Prize by the American Political Science Association for the best book published on legislative politics, and she was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2015.

Binder received her Ph.D. in political science from the University of Minnesota in 1995 and B.A. from Yale University in 1986. She joined Brookings in 1995 and George Washington University in 1999. Between 1986 and 1990, she served as legislative aide and press secretary to Rep. Lee Hamilton (D-Indiana).

A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Regulatory Transparency Project events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on the website does not imply an endorsement or relationship between the person and the Regulatory Transparency Project. The Regulatory Transparency Project takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.

Contributions

Deep Dive Episode 248 – Creatures of Statute III: Congress’ Responsibility to Answer the Major Questions

December 22, 2022

In the third in a lecture series on the administrative state, experts discuss the major questions doctrine and how Congress may respond to the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. EPA.

Listen to this podcast

Creatures of Statute III: Congress’ Responsibility to Answer the Major Questions

November 29, 2022

In the third in a lecture series on the administrative state, experts discuss the major questions doctrine and how Congress may respond to the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. EPA.

Watch this video
Skip to content